Skip to content

New Co-Editor Announced for Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice

January 23, 2018

Larissa Gordon, instruction and scholarly communications outreach librarian at Arcadia University, has been selected as the new Co-Editor of Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice, the scholarly open access journal of the Pennsylvania Library Association. Gordon will be taking the place of Anne Behler who has served as co-editor for the past 3 years. Larissa Gordon holds master’s degrees in library and information science as well as education, and is currently pursuing a master’s degree in English. She has a strong record of professional publications and presentations and previously served as chair of the College and Research Division of the PA Library Association. Gordon has also served as a news editor and peer reviewer for Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice.

Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice is peer-reviewed by members of the Pennsylvania library community and is freely available online. Articles may be read online at palrap.org. The journal provides an opportunity for librarians in Pennsylvania to share their knowledge and experience with practicing librarians across the Commonwealth and beyond. Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice is published by the University Library System (ULS), University of Pittsburgh, through its E-Journal Publishing Program.

Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice – Call for Submissions

January 19, 2018
by

Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice (PaLRaP.org) is accepting submissions for research, practice, feature and commentary articles as well as news items for the Spring 2018 issue (vol. 6, no. 1).

Research, practice, feature, and commentary manuscripts are welcomed at any time; however, for full consideration for the spring issue, please submit your manuscripts by February 28, 2018.

News item submissions are also welcome at any time. For full consideration for the spring issue, however, please submit your news items here by April 13, 2018.

See the submission guidelines and section policies at palrap.org for more information.

Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice is the peer reviewed, online, open access publication of the Pennsylvania Library Association, and is managed by the College & Research Division. This journal provides an opportunity for librarians in Pennsylvania to share their knowledge and experience with practicing librarians across the Commonwealth and beyond. It includes articles from all areas of librarianship. Contributions from all types of libraries and library personnel in the Commonwealth are welcome.

==

PaLRap is published by the University Library System (ULS), University of Pittsburgh, through its E-Journal Publishing Program.
Published biannually: April and October
Co-Editors: Larissa Gordon, Arcadia University; Tom Reinsfelder, Penn State University

Diversity: Why is Diversity in Collection Development so Vital? Part One

January 19, 2018

Due to the continuous changing environment, diverse collection development has become an essential part of academic libraries. Library materials should promote awareness on diverse social issues and not exclude material that seems offensive. A diverse collection should also reflect all perspectives and ideas and include controversial material such as political content, economic theory, religious beliefs, social philosophies, sexual content and expression, and other potentially debated topics.

Collections such as these enhance cultural knowledge within society that provide a welcoming learning environment. It is uncomfortable for a patron to enter a library and find there is limited or no resources available to them regarding their ethnicity. If libraries are going to represent themselves as providing academic services to students then they should recognize academic needs amidst multicultural groups.

Libraries must have a clear view of what diversity means to the library’s collection whether it is economics, political, religious, minority, social, or sexual issues before beginning a collection assessment. Diversity in the collections also helps to broaden student’s awareness of the world!

The Case for Closed

January 18, 2018

Image from James Royal-Lawson CC BY-SA 2.0

Captioning has long been a difficult sell for librarians creating video tutorials (or raising the issue with other faculty members). The landscape of options merely 7 years ago was bleak, requiring by-hand adjustments of the timings down to hundreds of a second and typing out each line with many clicks between. Sometimes these options came without a preview so that the captions would have to be exported, inserted, checked and then back to the original glitchy interface to fix and, often, repeat.

This changed with the introduction of Amara (then called Universal Subtitles) in 2010. Amara was aimed at crowdsourcing translations, but the central insight of the interface made captioning much easier. Instead of requiring fingers to leave home row to click around after each part of a sentence, Amara had a fully keyboard interface allowing the setting of timing with key press and reducing greatly the amount of time required. This was true, at least, for touch typists. Otherwise, the amount of time required to caption a video was a high multiple of the video length.

The situation today is better. Google finally updated it’s captioning interface in YouTube in the last few years to one strikingly similar to Amara with elements of crowdsourcing and a fully keyboard interface option. YouTube’s automatic captions are now approaching usability without editing. A workflow for captioning videos:

  • Have a transcript -> upload to YouTube (check the automatic timing)
  • Own the video -> upload to YouTube, fix the automatic captions
  • Don’t own -> use Amara or YouTube’s crowdsourcing option

With the possibility of fixing automatic captions instead of typing all the speech, folks that are not touch typists are now looking at an equivalent amount of time spent. The excuses for not captioning are now fewer than ever.

#1LIB1REF Campaign Offers Opportunity for Librarians to Improve Wikipedia

January 16, 2018

As librarians, we all have an opinion, perhaps even a strong one, regarding Wikipedia. Whether you love, hate, or hold some middling attitude toward this ubiquitous resource, the next two weeks provide a great opportunity to improve the site.

Wikipedia’s #1LIB1REF campaign, in which librarians contribute needed citations to the site, runs this January 15th through February 3rd.

If you have ever lamented the lack of a Wikipedia citation, or the poor quality of an existing one, now is your chance to step up and add some serious scholarship to a page on a favorite topic. If you do not have a page in mind, think locally. Why not add a citation to a Wikipedia page on a famous Pennsylvanian, perhaps one from your own hometown? Or, consider doing the same for the entry on a historical event or location in our state.

Something so worthwhile is rarely this easy and fun. To learn more about the campaign and how to contribute a citation, click here.