CRD Virtual Journal Club Summer Wrap-Up
This past summer, the College & Research Division hosted a virtual journal club, which met online three times to discuss scholarship in the library science field. The CRD Journal Club was originally established in Summer 2018, and typically runs in the summer, spring, and fall of each year. The theme for the Summer 2021 semester was librarians’ collaboration with faculty.
For the first session, the participants read two articles: “The invertebrates scale of librarianship: Finding your niche,” by Samantha Dannick, published in College & Research Library News, and “From service role to partnership: Faculty voices on collaboration with librarians,” by Maria A. Perez-Stable, Judith M. Arnold, LuMarie F. Guth, and Patricia Fravel Vander Meer, published in portal: Libraries and the Academy. The group spent a lot of time discussing different types of collaboration, noting instances which seem to be more authentic partnerships and discussing when they felt like “jellyfish” librarians, as discussed in Dannick’s article.
The second session focused on discussing the article “Kill the one-shot: Using a collaborative rubric to liberate the librarian–instructor partnership” by Nora Belzowski and Mark Robison, published in the Journal of Library Administration. The discussion focused mostly around the rubric implemented by Belzowki and Robison in their article, and how it could positively impact their own instructional scheduling and practices.
For the third and final session, participants discussed the article “Library research sprints as a tool to engage faculty and promote collaboration,” by Jenny McBurney, Shanda L. Hunt, Mariya Gyendina, Sarah Jane Brown, Benjamin Wiggins, and Shane Nackerud, published in portal: Libraries and the Academy. The discussion around the research sprints as described in the article morphed into larger conversations on librarians’ relationship to faculty, as service providers and as colleagues, which can often be complicated by a librarian’s status on campus. Job expectations and the realities of what librarians can (and should) be asked to provide also came up through conversations and examples.
This series’ discussion offered advice for forming collaborative partnerships where both parties have equal benefits from the outcome, and provided different perspectives on barriers to collaboration across different institutions.
Look for our upcoming emails and let us know at crdvirtualjournalclub@gmail.com if you have any suggestions for topics/issues you would like to discuss!
Happy Frankenstein Day?
August 30th, apparently, is “Frankenstein Day.” No, it isn’t a national holiday. In the U.S. that would require a Presidential proclamation or an act of Congress. However according to holidayinsights.com in 1997 Ron MacCloskey from Westfield, New Jersey started naming someone “who has made a significant contribution to the promotion of Frankenstein” and awarding them “The Franky” on the last Friday of October, presumably given its proximity to Halloween. The reason August 30th is heralded as Frankenstein Day is because it is the anniversary date for the birthday of the writer Mary Shelley, the author of The Modern Prometheus, better known as Frankenstein.
While Mr. MacCloskey’s intent was to have a day, or rather a night for partying in celebration of the monster, the literati have transformed it into a cultural celebration of the author and her most famous work. A book which has been adapted and referenced in countless other books, movies, plays, and television shows, from parodies like Mel Brooks’ “Young Frankenstein” to the serious and thought-provoking opera which premiered in 2019.
Without knowing if “The Franky” is still a thing, in honor of Frankenstein Day I would like to nominate two Digital Humanities projects. First let me say both are listed in the Catalogue of Digital Editions, which gathers “digital editions and texts in an attempt to survey and identify best practice in the field of digital scholarly editing.”
The one is an XML-TEI project at the University of Maryland completed in 2009. According to the catalogue’s philological statement, “Frankenstein” provides: “Complete information on the source of the text, the author, date and accuracy of the digital edition, as well as Digital Humanities standards implemented.” The other is “Frankenstein; or, the Modern Prometheus” which claims to be “The Pennsylvania Electronic Edition” edited by a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, and keyed with the help of many others. It has various editions of the novel and critical scholarly aids for the study of it. Both are Open Access resources which give one insight into the text and its author.
Happy Birthday, Mary Shelley!
Got an Appetite for Visual Storytelling? Dig into the Lynd Ward Graphic Novel Prize Winners!
Craving a bit of visual storytelling that lasts longer than a serving of TikTok, YouTube, or Instagram? In a world hungry for image-based content, the graphic novel continues to sustain and grow ever-popular as a visual storytelling specialty.
As noted by Pennsylvania (PA) Center for the Book emeritus director Steven Herb, the “Penn State University (PSU) Libraries have been on the cutting edge of recognizing the graphic novel as an important and emerging medium through our collections, programming, and our leadership in the integration of the form with academic programs studying its scholarly attributes (English, literature, art, popular culture, LGBT studies, women’s studies, history, and science).”
These observations were part of the October 1, 2010, planning proposal for the Lynd Ward Graphic Novel Prize and were supported by examples such as the Pattee Library exhibit, Graphic Novels: Comics as Art, History, and Literature, curated by former Coordinator of Audio-Visual Collections and Fred Waring’s America, Eileen Akin (Jan-Mar 2007), and the Graphic Novel Speaker Series inspired by the exhibit, sponsored and co-sponsored by the PA Center for the Book and various PSU Library departments between February 2007 and March 2010.
Together these two initiatives gave rise to the annual Lynd Ward Graphic Novel prize administered by the PA Center for the Book. The PA Center for the Book is an affiliate of the Center for the Book established in 1977 at the Library of Congress and is sponsored by the PSU University Libraries. It encourages Pennsylvania’s citizens and residents to study, honor, celebrate, and promote books, reading, libraries, and literacy.
Established in 2011 in acknowledgement of Lynd Ward’s contributions to the genre with his introduction of wordless, woodcut novels in American (1929-1937), the Lynd Ward Graphic Novel Prize holds visual work to a standard of being more “than an illustrated text-driven novel” and expects it to demonstrate “artistic and literary quality, ambition, and/or innovation,” while weaving an “engaging and descriptive narrative, in word choice and/or visually,” per the Lynd Ward Prize Selection Criteria.
Administered by PA Center for the Book Assistant Director, Ellysa Stern Cahoy and with support of Advisory Board members, the Lynd Ward Prize is awarded annually to “the best graphic novel, fiction or nonfiction, published in the previous calendar year by a living U.S. or Canadian citizen or resident.”
Titles recognized by the award include King of King Court: A Memoir by Travis Dandro (Drawn & Quarterly), noted by 2020 Judges as the winner for its “deft intermingling of word and image” to effectively convey a deeply personal story of familial trauma and resilience. That same year, New Kid by Jerry Craft (Quill Tree Books/HarperCollins) was selected as the Honor Book for its “nuanced representation of an African-American boy” navigating private [middle] school and home life and its illustration of “how toxic our [visual] ways of ‘reading the other’ can be.”
Dragon Hoops by Gene Luen Yang (First Second), one of two 2021 Honor Books, has also been named the Best Publication for Teens by the 2021 Will Eisner Comic Industry Awards.
The Lynd Ward Graphic Novel Prize winner of 2021 is Guantanamo Voices: True Accounts from the World’s Most Infamous Prison edited by Sarah Mirk (Abrams ComicArts), lauded for its diverse collection of points-of-view presented in “a solid example of graphic journalism.”
A Virtual Celebration and Presentation by Mirk will be held:
Tuesday, November 16, 2021
7:00-8:00 p.m.
Facebook Invite
– Click Here for Virtual Access! –
Mirk will receive a $2,500 prize along with, courtesy of the Library of America, a two-volume set of Lynd Ward: Six Novels in Woodcuts by Lynd Ward (2010).
Previous Lynd Ward Prize award ceremonies, in which creators share details and images of their creative process and vision, can be viewed from the Lynd Ward Prize Playlist on the PA Center for the Book YouTube page.
As the genre expands, the Lynd Ward Graphic Novel Prize continues to acknowledge high-quality work based on its effectiveness in delivering “a sum experience that is superior to its respective components.”
Meanwhile, Penn State’s appetite for the genre continues to grow, for example, with the introduction of Penn State Press’ Graphic Mundi imprint in 2021 (which published Menopause: A Comic Treatment [Graphic Medicine], winner of two 2021 Eisner Awards) and the expansion of scholarly fields, such as Visual Literacy in Graphic Novels/Comics, supported by Comics & Animation PSU Library Guides, among others.
So when the latest Snapchat dematerializes and you’ve exed your last pop-up ad of the day, settle in with a graphic novel – perhaps a wordless tale that deepens one woodcut image per page at a time by Ward himself – if you crave a hearty story with cumulative, synergistic power.
For more information about the Lynd Ward Graphic Novel Prize, visit the PA Center for the Book website or contact Ellysa Stern Cahoy (ellysa@psu.edu), Assistant Director.
To Map or Not to Map? That is the Question.
Curriculum mapping projects are an increasingly common way librarians engage with their liaison programs. A quick search for “(curriculum mapping) AND (libraries OR library OR librarian)” in Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts via EBSCOhost in August 2021 returned 109 results, with the ten most relevant cited 22 times. The question remains though, what benefit is there to you to embark on such a project; is it worthwhile for your liaison areas?
Curriculum mapping examines what is taught, who teaches it, if instructional goals are met, and the efficacy of the process. Program learning objectives are charted visually to align with courses and form a map to allow the reader a birds eye view of a program’s curriculum as a whole, discover gaps and redundancies, and empower departments to enhance student learning (Buchanan et al., 2015, p. 95). A curriculum map will look something like this:
| Course 101 | Course 202 | Course 303 | Course 404 | |
| Program Learning Outcome 1 | ||||
| Program Learning Outcome 2 | ||||
| Program Learning Outcome 3 | ||||
| Program Learning Outcome 4 |
In libraries, curriculum mapping is often used to guide the library’s instructional efforts, mapping course learning outcomes against ACRL’s Framework for Information Literacy (Khailova, 2021, p. 2). Bullard and Holden (2008) share four key advantages to conducting a curriculum mapping project:
- Key courses where information literacy instruction can be delivered at the point of need can now be prioritized with evidence.
- New faculty outreach opportunities and potential instruction inroads are discovered, again with evidence to support the effort.
- Departmental language surrounding information literacy is discovered, allowing librarians and faculty to speak the same language.
- Librarians are kept up to date on current departmental needs, further helping the library provide relevant services to the department (pp. 17–18).
The benefits shared by Bullard and Holden (2008) make it clear that curriculum mapping projects benefit libraries, in spite of the time investment required to create and upkeep a map. While examples of libraries and librarians conducting curriculum mapping projects are easier to find today, Bullard and Holden’s outline for how to conduct a curriculum mapping project at your library is still helpful: gather syllabi from the department or faculty; analyze learning outcomes for information literacy components and weaknesses; draft your map, using departmental language; gather feedback from departmental faculty with whom you already have inroads; incorporate their feedback; begin marketing to whole department (2008, p. 21). As you gain more feedback from faculty about the map, you can grow and adapt the map to better suit your needs as a liaison.
References and Further Reading
Archambault, S. G., & Masunaga, J. (2015). Curriculum Mapping as a Strategic Planning Tool. Journal of Library Administration, 55(6), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2015.1054770
Castro, G. A. G., & Eldermire, E. (2015). Laying the groundwork for information literacy at a research university. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 16(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-12-2014-0044
Buchanan, H., Webb, K. K., Houk, A. H., & Tingelstad, C. (2015). Curriculum Mapping in Academic Libraries. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 21(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2014.1001413
Bullard, K. A., & Holden, D. H. (2008). Hitting a Moving Target: Curriculum Mapping, Information Literacy and Academe. 5.
Jacobs, H. H. (2004). Getting Results with Curriculum Mapping. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Khailova, L. (2021). Using curriculum mapping to scaffold and equitably distribute information literacy instruction for graduate professional studies programs. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102281
Truesdale, V., Thompson, C., & Lucas, M. (2004). Use of Curriculum Mapping to Build a Learning Community. In Getting Results with Curriculum Mapping (p. 15). Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) recently shared its “Keeping Up With…” edition, which is sponsored by the American Psychological Association (APA). In this edition, Desirae Zingarelli-Sweet, the reference librarian at Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School (New York), speaks about the necessity of trauma-informed pedagogy within higher education. For several decades already, K-12 educators and policymakers have been tasked with the struggle to define “trauma-informed;” on the flipside, this same conversation within higher education has only been gaining momentum over the past five to ten years, with much of the discussion having its origins in social work education.
Given the circumstances of 2020, which have been characterized as “cascading collective traumas,” the topic of traumatic stress and its lingering effects has been more frequently discussed within higher education. Traumas such as the COVID-19 pandemic, economic recession and fall-out (primarily due to the coronavirus), racial tension and division, and a political polarization within the United States, the likes which have most likely not been witnessed since the Civil War, “have disproportionately hurt minoritized communities and those of low socioeconomic status, deepening existing inequalities and compounding race-based historical traumas” (Cohen Silver et al. 4). Coupling these collective traumas with individual potentially traumatic events, such as life-threatening illness, loss of loved ones, loneliness and depression from the isolation and social distancing brought on by the pandemic, unsafe neighborhoods, and police brutality, can continue to have negative impacts on our short-term and long-term mental health (Cohen Silver et al. 4-5).
*(Davidson 4)
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) defines psychological trauma as “results from an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life-threatening and that has lasting adverse effects on the individual’s functioning and mental, physical, social, emotional, or spiritual well-being” (7). This is definitely a significant broadening of the definition of trauma in recent decades, extending well beyond clinical diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD. Trauma can be experienced when an individual’s coping mechanisms for maintaining control, connecting with others, and having a sense of meaning are overwhelmed by external stressors. This in turns leaves the person with intense feelings of helplessness and terror (Herman 33-34).
There are some basic types of trauma. Acute trauma refers to a single episode of an unexpected event which causes immense stress on an individual’s coping mechanisms, such as a car accident, one-time rape or attemped murder, or a catostrophic weather event. Complex or developmental trauma refers to sustained or repeated episodes of trauma and stress, such as living with a life-threatening illness, combat, continuous physical or sexual abuse, severe, ongoing neglect, or poverty. Continuous traumatic stress or historical/generational trauma addresses the repercussions of stressors triggered by “ongoing, systematic, and/or cumulative group trauma,” which includes racism, slavery and its lingering effects, or discrimination based on one’s gender, disabilities, and so forth (Kira et al. 181).
*(Davidson 6)
According to Janice Carello and Lisa D. Butler, traumatic stress is something that affects postsecondary students: 66%-94% of students report experiencing at least one traumatic event by the time they start college, with 9%-12% of first-year students meeting the clinical criteria for PTSD (263). Academic environments can play a key role in facilitating students’ recovery from traumatic stress in a favorable, positive way towards cultivating resilience, “but only if [the students] feel safe enough to experiment with new solutions” (Van der Kolk 351). This is where trauma-informed teaching principles and strategies come into focus. Based in part on SAMHSA’s six key principles for adopting an organizational trauma-informed approach, Janice Carello’s seven principles for trauma-informed postsecondary teaching and learning (which can also be applied to information literacy and library instruction) are as follows:
- Physical, emotional, social, and academic safety. Respect the students’ individual needs and create a safe, inclusive environment where students can be at ease with making and learning from their mistakes.
- Trustworthiness and transparency. Establishing trust with students is essential; make expectations clear, operate transparently, be consistent and reliable, and maintain appropriate boundaries.
- Support and connection. Using appropriate sources, facilitate peer support and connection.
- Collaboration and mutuality. Make sure students have adequate opportunities to contribute input and make decisions cooperatively.
- Empowerment, voice, and choice. Allow students to build competence and self-confidence whenever possible by having them make their own decisions.
- Social justice. Honor each student’s experiences and identities by creating awareness of incidences of privilege, power, and oppression.
- Resilience, growth, and change. Provide feedback to emphasize strengths and resilience over deficiencies (10-11).
As a majority of colleges and universities across the country are expecting to make full, “normal” returns to campuses this month, we must keep in mind that collectively, our students have been through unprecedented circumstances over the past eighteen months. Even the experience of physically being on campus, in a classroom, and interacting with people in the flesh as opposed to virtually is going to be overwhelming for some. Heightened awareness of equity, diversity, and inclusion may spark heated discussions about oppression and discrimination which can trigger recollections of traumatic events. Creating a safe environment to communicate empathetically, enforce connection, and reassure is essential. A very useful phrase to ignite conversation is “help me understand.” Empower students to make the best decisions possible for themselves and their learning by being flexible and allowing choices whenever possible, such as with seating, lighting, and mode of participation (Carello 10-11). Be sure to invite students to share how they are feeling at key junctures, but do not mandate participation (Carello and Butler 270). Another useful trauma-informed teaching strategy is to avoid the romanticization of trauma narratives or the implication that such trauma is desirable. This can invite the disclosure of trauma experiences among the students without having the appropriate environment or adequate support already in place (Carello and Butler, 162, 164).
Shannon Davidson’s Trauma-Informed Practices for Postsecondary Education: A Guide is available as a free download and offers valuable advice on trauma-informed practices and strategies. Because recent events continue (and will continue) to instrumentally affect how we relate to our students, Zingarelli-Sweet concludes, it is a perfect opportunity for librarians to take advantage of recent advances in other fields and to more deeply integrate current understandings of trauma and learning into their instructional practice.
Carello, Janice. “Examples of Trauma-Informed Teaching and Learning in College Classrooms.”
Trauma-Informed Teaching & Learning: Bringing a Trauma-Informed Approach to Higher Education, Mar. 2020,
https://traumainformedteachingblog.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/examples-of-titl-in-coll ege-classrooms- 3.2020-color-3.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug. 2021.
Carello, Janice and Lisa D. Butler. “Potentially Perilous Pedagogies: Teaching Trauma is Not the Same as Trauma-Informed Teaching.” Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, vol. 15, no. 2, 2014, pp. 153-168.
Carello, Janice and Lisa D. Butler. “Practicing What We Teach: Trauma-Informed Educational Practice.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work, vol. 35, no. 3, 2015, pp. 262-278, www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08841233.2015.1030059?needAccess=true.
Cohen Silver, Roxane, et al. “Coping with Cascading Collective Traumas in the United States.” Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 4-6. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-00981-x.pdf.
Davidson, Shannon. Trauma-Informed Practices for Postsecondary Education: A Guide. Education Northwest, 2017.
Herman, Judith. Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence – From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. 1R ed., Basic Books, 2015.
Kira, Ibrahim A., et al. “The Dynamics of Cumulative Trauma and Trauma Types in Adults Patients with Psychiatric Disorders: Two Cross-Cultural Studies.” Traumatology, vol. 19, no. 3, 2013, pp. 179-183. https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1177%2F1534765612459892.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. SAMHSA’s Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4884, 2014.
Van der Kolk, Bessel. The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Penguin Books, 2014.




