Integrating scholarly ideas into popular websites
It seems like one of the most common pieces of advice for librarians is that we should try to “be where our students are,” or more generally, “be where our users are.” This can be accomplished in countless ways, whether it’s reaching out to students with your library’s Facebook page or embedding reference librarians in online courses. Even though it’s an ongoing effort, I feel like librarians have been pretty good at making themselves present in such environments. But what about information itself? That is – good information? Should we try to make that “be where our users are,” as well?
I’ve noticed a few trends that have made me think a lot about this lately. One is the rise of websites like BuzzFeed and Reddit which are increasingly being used (especially by young people) as information sources. According to a Chronicle blog post, one USC professor believes that we can harness the popularity of these sites in order to introduce students to more meaningful, in-depth topics; he’s even created a manifesto for “BuzzAdemia,” a new journal intended for ‘BuzzFeed-style scholarship.’ Rather than sharing ideas in the traditional scholarly format, authors would create a short, readable piece which incorporates the features that BuzzFeed is so popular for – humor, memes, “listicles,” and so on.
One example of what a “BuzzAdemia” article might look like is grad student Chris Rodley’s “Post-Structuralism Explained With Hipster Beards,” which has apparently gotten over 220,000 page views.
Another trend is students’ attraction to sources like Wikipedia which contain user-generated, easy-to-read content. One website that is rising to popularity is Genius.com, a place where user-generated annotations act as a supplement to various forms of text or media: lyrics, articles, audio scripts, book chapters, poems, medicine bottle labels, etc. Consider a TED talk given by physician Atul Gawande in 2012. Although TED talks are potentially rich sources of information, students could have trouble comprehending Gawande’s ideas for several reasons. If he uses the word, “digitalis,” how do they know what that means? If he claims that 2 million people per year are inflicted with hospital-acquired infections, how do they know that statement is true? And what kind of infections? By reading the annotations — which could consist of text, links, images, video, or all of the above — the Genius platform provides an opportunity to learn such details.
(See Gawande’s TED talk on Genius.com. Click the highlighted passages for annotations.)
I think concepts like “BuzzAdemia” and Genius.com definitely provide potential for integrating scholarly ideas into popular websites. But I admit that I have some mixed feelings about it, too. Would students be any more receptive to scholarly content if it’s mixed in with popular content (or resembles popular content)? How would we determine if it had a positive impact on their learning or research processes? Would they even notice it?
What do you think?
Making Students Gritty
I am currently enrolled in a MOOC that examines designing and developing educational technologies. One of the topics in the course is helping students to develop non-cognitive skills that will help them succeed in school, specifically perseverance or, as it is sometimes called, “grit.” I hate to admit it, but I never took time to think about the development of non-cognitive skills that help students succeed. Maybe that’s because of the current focus on assessment and measuring skills and because everything I’ve ever learned about writing goals in education stresses writing goals that are specific and measurable; non-cognitive skills are often anything but specific and measurable. But this section of the course really got me thinking about how librarians can help to foster non-cognitive skills.
The following brief video clip was assigned as part of the lesson in the course, and in it Angela Duckworth discusses her theory of grit as a better predictor of success than IQ.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H14bBuluwB8
After watching the video, I got to thinking how we as librarians help encourage our students to become grittier. I realized that fostering grit is an inherent part of information literacy and of the research process, especially when students receive encouragement during this time.
Students, particularly first year students who have never been required to use scholarly resources, often approach the library research process with an air of confidence – they are master searchers because they have been Googling since grade school. But library searching can quickly shatter this confidence because it isn’t always easy to find the answers they are looking for on the first search try, and especially on the first page of search results. Rather than students thinking this lack of success is natural because library databases are more difficult to search than Google and scholarly resources on a topic aren’t always as easy to uncover as websites, students seem to think the fault is within them. How many times does a student say to us, “This might be a stupid question, but…” or “Everyone else can find information on their topic, but I can’t,” or something along those lines? These are the teachable moments where I, without realizing it, have invoked Dr. Dweck’s growth mindset that was referenced in the video. I have explained to students that databases are difficult to search and that these search tips are easily forgotten if you don’t use them every day, but the more and more you use them, the better you will get at searching and understanding how to search databases. We must all make sure that when we are teaching students either at the reference desk or in a session, we are letting them know that an inability to find what they need does not mean they are stupid and incapable; it just means they need some guidance but they will get it in time.
In addition to utilizing growth mindset during information literacy moments, the research process itself teaches students that it’s natural to have to search multiple times in multiple ways before finding an answer. They are taught that it’s natural to not be able to find what you are looking for on the first page of results. And they are taught that it’s okay to not know the best way to search right away but they can ask for help and learn better ways to search. Essentially this process teaches them to not expect to get it right the first time (even professionals don’t always get it right the first time), but to keep digging until you find what you need and to seek advice to learn how to improve if you aren’t finding what you’re looking for. This teaches students that they can find what they need; failure is a natural part of succeeding but in order to succeed they must keep trying.
Essentially in our quest to teach students specific, measurable goals, our role as educators who work within a system with ever shrinking budgets often causes us to overlook the importance of non-cognitive skills. Have you ever thought about non-cognitive skills and your role as a librarian? How do you think we can help make students grittier? Please share your thoughts on these questions and on this topic.
PaLA West Branch “Chapter Chatter” Event
Please join the West Branch Chapter of PaLA on Friday, November 7, at Bucknell University, for discussion and dessert. This meeting is open to PaLA members and non-members – please share this with all of your library colleagues!
RSVP to Barbara McGary by Thursday, November 6, bmcgary@jvbrown.edu. Hope to see you there!
Alison Gregory, Director of Library Services, Lycoming College
Discovery and the Future of the Catalog
A Panel Discussion
Wednesday, November 12, 1:00pm
How’s that new discovery service really working out in your library?
Join the Connect & Communicate series’ panel of academic librarians, from colleges and universities in Pennsylvania, for a discussion about discovery service and the future of the catalog.
Panelists include:
Sara Pike (Shippensburg University of PA)
Robert Flatley (Kutztown University of PA)
Sarah Hartman-Caverly (Delaware County Community College)
Amanda Avery (Marywood University)
Jamey Harris (Mansfield University)
Ashley Esposito (Shippensburg University of PA)
The Connect & Communicate Series Planning Committee is pleased to offer this virtual discussion, in which panelists will discuss what they learned and the challenges they encountered as they worked through the process of selection, implementation, and assessment of discovery services. Find out how discovery has changed instruction in their libraries, what faculty and students think about it, and where things are headed in the future.
Register at the following link: http://goo.gl/forms/0yUIOkAXYv
Join in on the conversation on Wednesday, November 12, at 1:00 p.m. at http://centralpenn.adobeconnect.com/crdccs/
- For this program, participants will need speakers to hear the presenter speaking, but will not need any additional audio equipment. Participants may ask questions via the chat box; moderators will monitor the Chat box and facilitate question and response.
- A recording of the program will be made available to PaLA members following the program.
Before the Discussion:
To test your computer (recommended): http://centralpenn.adobeconnect.com/crdccs/
To run the Adobe Connect Meeting Connection Diagnostic:http://admin.adobeconnect.com/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm
If you would like to be emailed directly about this and other upcoming Connect & Communicate Series events, you may provide us with your name and email address here: http://goo.gl/4urXl . (If you submitted previously, you are still on our list.)
Please continue to share your ideas for programming topics, speakers, or formats with us! We’re getting some great suggestions and themes are starting to emerge, but we could also use some more speaker names. If you or someone you know is doing something great in Pennsylvania’s academic libraries, tell us about it!
The Connect & Communicate Series of online programming offered by the PaLA College & Research Division aims to help foster a community of academic librarians in Pennsylvania. Please contact Jill Hallam-Miller at jillhallam-miller@centralpenn.edu or at 717-728-2415 with questions.
GSU e-Reserves Copyright/Fair Use Decision Overturned
On Friday the 11th Circuit Appeals Court overturned the Cambridge University Press, Oxford university Press, and Sage Publications versus Georgia State University ruling. Though the new ruling overturns a few of the fair use decisions made by the lower court, some library advocates have been blogging that the important rulings are still in place. If you are interested in reading further on this case and drawing your own conclusions about its implications for libraries, here is a brief current bibliography:
“11th Circuit Rules on Georgia State Fair Use Case” — The Copyright Librarian
“A Win for Publishers” — Inside Higher Ed

