Skip to content

Social Media as a Metaphor for Scholarly Communication

May 3, 2015

In March, I was fortunate to attend the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) biennial conference in Portland, Oregon.

By far, my favorite program was the all-day ScholComm Camp, held just before the conference began. Organized by Amy Buckland of the University of Chicago, Carmen Mitchell of California State University at San Marcos, and Char Booth of the Claremont Colleges, this was an un-conference in which the participants crowd-sourced topics of interest on scholarly communication. These topics included library publishing, copyright, altmetrics, and finding different ways to talk about scholarly communication. (You can see the agenda and some notes from the camp here: http://bit.ly/ScholCommCamp).

Regarding the latter, I’ve spent some time over the last couple of years doing just that, trying out different messages with different audiences, from undergraduates to recent Ph.D. recipients to veteran faculty. Why? Because scholarly communication is primarily a library term, one that means little or nothing outside our own buildings and professional literature.

During this discussion, one of the attendees (and, sorry, I can’t remember her name as I’d like to give her credit) made what I considered to be a provocative statement: That she teaches undergrads about scholarly communication by calling it “social media for researchers.” She referred to scholarly communication as social media, she said, because the latter is a term that undergrads can identify with more readily.

At first, in my head, I rejected calling scholarly communication social media—-it seemed like an oversimplification of a complex set of processes that has developed over hundreds of years. How is the burgeoning role of library as publisher related to social media? How do the nuances and complexities of copyright law resemble Facebook and Twitter?

But the more I thought about the statement and considered how I have used examples from social media to explain scholarly communication topics, the more I started to reconsider my initial negative reaction.

For example, I have discussed memes as a way to convey the idea of transformative works under U.S. copyright law. How you create a meme–an image from one source, perhaps a quote from another source or your own commentary, juxtaposed in a way to convey a new meaning–works well when explaining different aspects of copyright law and the doctrine of fair use. Mash-ups and remixes can be used in this regard, too. Together all three examples illustrate the challenges of traditional copyright and the benefits of copyleft or copyright+ approaches, such as Creative Commons (CC) licenses. With CC and other copyleft licenses, a creator easily communicates how others can reuse a work or immediately place the work in the public domain. Doing so would certainly foster the original intent of copyright in the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Section 8), “to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”

I have discussed faculty research profiling sites and systems, such as Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Academia.edu, Symplectic, and my university’s own institutional repository, referring to them as “online dating sites for faculty.” Just as no two dating sites or apps are alike, I suggest that researchers find the profile site that’s most appropriate to their discipline. And just as online dating requires a certain amount of extroversion to showcase “who’s the hottest,” researchers may have to be a bit more extroverted in marketing themselves so as to make others aware of their research interests and possibly find new research partners.

I’ve used Facebook and Twitter as ways to convey the concept of research impact metrics–how many likes and favorites do you get and what do they mean? Is the like from your Mom or Dad as meaningful to you as a like from your BFF or a colleague? Do you sometimes feel you have to like a post, even though you might not want to or agree with it? Do some posts get shared and liked more because they seem clever or are highly topical but, in reality, maybe aren’t that novel or of long-lasting interest? These are some of the same challenges in understanding research impact and metrics I would argue.

And I’ve also used blogging and microblogging tools, such as WordPress, Tumblr, and Twitter, as examples of new modes of scholarly publishing. They are non-traditional forms of scholarly communication, but they may have a huge impact, highlighting new or existing research and making scholarship more a part of public consciousness, than a monograph or journal article might.

I still think social media as a metaphor for scholarly communication has its limits. It might be a stretch to apply it to all scholarly communications topics. I still can imagine hesitating as I glibly describe to a group of faculty members that their sharing of scholarship is akin to social media. I think for researchers terms like reputation management or research impact would resonate better.

The curmudgeon in me resists simplifying things too much for students or anyone else. In a quotation often attributed to Mark Twain (but apparently not said by him), it has been noted that “for every problem, there is always a solution that is simple, obvious, and wrong.” And yet the curmudgeon in me is willing to concede that using social media as a metaphor to explain scholarly communication may actually be a good, simple, and not wrong-headed way to convey a complex message to researchers both new and veteran.

Who probably don’t know what the term scholarly communication means anyway!

Get Ready…Get Set…Fail! Okay, Try Again…

May 1, 2015

I recently began my own foray into a 3D printing program in my library, and to get beyond my hesitancy and dig in I sought inspiration at the Tri-State College Library Cooperative’s Spring Program, “The Maker Movement & You: Creating, Collaborating, and Crafting in your Library” which served as a fantastic forum to see what librarians and information professionals are doing under the large umbrella of “making”. Presentations from both sides of the academic/public library arena highlighted some of the large and small projects being supported through a little bit of money and a lot of creative energy from our peers.
As you may have guessed, the projects and initiatives showcased were designed for a very particular user base with differing interests in Making…from hobbyists to engineers…but what surprised me most was a common thread of best practices that ran through these disparate users and programs. Here are my (uber simple) takeaways:

  • Failure isn’t an option…it’s a certainty – Failure is a critical part of any ‘making’. Don’t put undue pressure on your makers to get it right the first time, or on yourself to show them how to get it right the first time. The beauty and joy of making is in the process…learn to explore and enjoy it.
  • 3D printing??? Who needs it?!?! – Yes, 3D printers are sexy right now. Anyone who has used one can tell you that, while we’re still on the ground floor of how this technology will change our daily living, we are a long way off from “Tea. Earl Grey. Hot!” The good news is that being a Maker Space doesn’t mean you need thousands of dollars in tech. Combining tried and true craft fodder such as clay, foam, glue, or stencils with dynamic free apps already on your phone or iPad and a bit of social media savvy can take you from zero to maker-space in a flash. Imagination > budget constraints.
  • Use the resources you already have – Whether it be an app on your smartphone or the closet full of leftover crafting supplies from last year’s program—use it. Again, it’s the process not the product we care about. If the energy is there then the medium becomes less important. Is it cooler if the play dough sculpture gets filmed as a stop-motion animation video with a user-created soundtrack? Yes. But it was a great idea when it was just the play dough. Create for creation’s sake and you won’t regret it.

  • Sit on your hands – Tied closely to the “fail” point above, a key to the process of designing a useful and engaging space is letting those you’ve brought in explore. Let them make odd choices…unusual approaches…something you know will not work…the entire point is the process. It’s the process that will drive success, not the produc

For anyone interested in the program or reaching out to the presenters who shed so much light on my own processes, I would encourage a visit to http://tclclibs.org/.

Spring Into a New Issue of Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice

May 1, 2015

Need a good professional read this (finally!) warm, sunny weekend in Pennsylvania? Golly, are you in luck! The Spring 2015 issue of Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice has just been published online at http://www.palrap.org.

Here are the highlights from this issue (vol. 3, no. 1)–

If you would like to comment on articles, receive individual e-mail announcements about new issues, or perhaps author an article yourself, please register as a reader/author on the PaLRaP site.

When sharing articles via social media, please use the hashtag #palrap.

PaLRaP is an open access, peer-reviewed publication sharing information about the research and practices at or of interest to Pennsylvania’s academic libraries–nonetheless, authors and readers are welcome from all types of libraries and library personnel.

PaLRaP is run by a volunteer staff of members of the College & Research Division of the Pennsylvania Library Association (CRD-PaLA), each holding two-year terms in various journal management positions. The journal is generously sponsored by CRD-PaLA and is published by the University Library System (ULS), University of Pittsburgh, through its D-Scribe digital publishing program.

PaLRaP is edited by John Barnett (University of Pittsburgh), Anne Behler (Penn State University), Tom Reinsfelder (Penn State Mont Alto).

We look forward to your feedback on the latest issue.

Health and Wellness in the Academic Library

April 29, 2015

At the end of March, I was able to attend the ACRL Conference (Association of College and Research Libraries) in Portland, Oregon, where some of the sessions I attended were focused on health and wellness for students, staff, and faculty in academic libraries. Over the past two years, my library has been involved in a campus-wide campaign focusing on health and wellness. Therefore, with our library participating in many of these wellness movements (heh), I attended a few ACRL sessions focused on these topics applied to the academic library.

During these sessions, presenters and participants shared ideas for stress reduction and study breaks for students. At our library, we have a program called Take a Break. Every night at 9:00 p.m. during the week before finals and the week of finals, the library provides a snack break sponsored by a different campus department, group, club, and/or by individuals. We send out campus-wide announcements requesting sponsorship a few weeks before finals, and students are appreciative of the donations of food and drinks each night. Students take a few minutes to stand up from their work, walk around the library, grab some snacks and beverages, and socialize while they refuel. We also ask participants to sign a thank-you note each evening for the sponsor(s), and both students and sponsors seem happy to participate.

In addition to Take a Break, we recently added exercise balls (also called stability balls), yoga mats, and yoga blocks to our circulating collection. Students use the exercise balls as substitutes for chairs throughout the library, and the yoga mats and blocks can be checked out for use with our student Yoga Club, which takes place in a room in the library once a week. Our students work with a local yoga studio to have certified teachers come to campus to conduct classes at a lower cost than the studio prices. Our administration has also added yoga classes for faculty and staff, and the instructor for those sessions has led the library staff in guided meditation and mindfulness exercises before staff training sessions, which is a wonderful way to set a positive and focused tone for meetings.

As another part of the wellness initiative, the library has developed a great collection of books, DVDs, kits, and other materials featuring nutrition information and exercise programs, which are popular with our whole university community: http://library.misericordia.edu/mu_library/pdf/wellnesscollectionlibrary.pdf. Our administrative assistant, Sue Lazur, created a display in January 2015 featuring these materials:Wellness Collection Display

I feel like this new focus on health and wellness in the library and on campus in general is helping our students, faculty, and staff feel more comfortable with these topics in an academic setting. Sometimes I think that putting 100% of our focus on academics puts our health and physical/mental well-being on a back burner, but there are ways to integrate those into our academic lives, such as using an exercise ball as a chair while studying or working to challenge and strengthen balance and physical awareness. What do you think of ideas like these? Is your library engaging in any health- or wellness-focused programming, collection development, or resource-sharing?

Author’s Note: I was not responsible for all of the projects described herein, so if you have questions about anything we’ve done, please feel free to comment, and I can get you in touch with the person behind the project!

WPWVC-ACRL Hosts Digital Preservation Webinar at Pitt and Clarion

April 24, 2015

The transition from print to digital has changed the way our libraries and archives share and preserve information and it also affects our personal collections.  Do you have a plan for saving your digital photos, videos or documents?

The Western Pennsylvania West Virginia Chapter of the Association of College & Research Libraries (WPWVC ACRL) Program Committee invites you to attend the Association for Library Collections & Technical Services (ALCTS) Preservation Week webinar, Digital Preservation for Individuals and Small Groups, on Thursday, April 30, at 2:00 p.m.

The webinar will be hosted by the chapter at four locations, two in Pennsylvania and two in West Virginia:

  • Carlson Library, Clarion University, Clarion, PA
  • University of Pittsburgh Library Resource Facility, Pittsburgh, PA
  • West Virginia University Downtown Campus Library, Morgantown, WV
  • Marshall Graduate College, South Charleston, WV

A preservation specialist will be available at the viewing sites to facilitate discussion and answer questions.

These sessions are open to WPWVC ACRL members and non-members. There is no charge to attend, as the webinar is sponsored by ALCTS and Gaylord Archival.

Please RSVP by April 28 using the registration form found here: http://tinyurl.com/wpwvcspring15webinar.

You can find out more about WPWVC-ACRL by visiting the chapter’s website.