Skip to content

Collaborating with Student Clubs: Games without Borders

February 4, 2018

Like many universities and colleges across the commonwealth, Penn State Brandywine has a large international student population. We also have a large population of students for whom English is a second (or third) language, though they were born in the United States. Our Multilingual Student Programs faculty and advisors host well-attended events, trips, and lunchtime talks, and the Multicultural Club is one of the most active student groups on campus. Naturally, the library wanted to be involved with these students and their enthusiastic presence at Brandywine.

One very easy way which we found to be connected to the group involves games. A few times a semester, the Multicultural Club hosts an International Game Break, where snacks are provided and students come to play games that are popular in countries outside the United States. Some examples of the tabletop games that the Multicultural Club purchased are Go, which originated in China around 5,500 years ago, Ludo, which is from India circa 3300 BC, Xiangqi, which many are familiar with as Chinese Checkers, Machi Koro, originally designed and released in Japan, and Carrom (aka Karrom), a shuffleboard game that is popular in Nepal, India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. For our international and multilingual students, these games are often a piece of home that they can share with their new friends. For our U.S. students, once they experience them at an International Game Break event, they want to play again.

The library got involved very easily by barcoding and circulating these games, after discussing the process with the Multicultural Student Club. The club needed a place to house the games when not in use, we had shelf space; they wanted a process to let students borrow them for an afternoon or overnight, we had the means to make that happen. An easy partnership between the library and the Multilingual Student Programs coordinator began. The library now also displays the games and their history around midterms and finals week, as a stress-reduction suggested activity, and a collaboration between the Multicultural Student Club and library is in the works to purchase more games for student use.

While not all campuses have the kind of population that Brandywine does, any kind of collaboration between student groups and the library benefits students, the library, and the campus as a whole. For example, students now see the library as a place not only for computers and books, but also to meet their friends to borrow a game. The library has a more active role in promoting events for the Multicultural Club and Multilingual Student Programs. Our international students see the library as a welcoming place that embraces their culture, which in turn plays a small but important part in these students feeling comfortable at Brandywine. As Brandywine Vairo Library, and university libraries everywhere, strives towards equity, diversity, and internationalism, we hope to work more with our diverse population and student clubs to promote their events and activities. 

 

C&CS Upcoming Session: IF I APPLY: Updated CRAAP Test for Evaluating Sources

February 2, 2018
by

The Connect & Communicate Series presents

IF I APPLY: Updated CRAAP Test for Evaluating Sources

Presenters: Kat Phillips, Sabrina Thomas and Eryn Roles

February 16th, Friday, 1pm– on Zoom!

Register here!

Evaluating sources for credibility is the first step to healthy civic learning. Traditionally, systematic source evaluation remained focused on source content with the most notable example, the CRAAP Test. Kat Phillips, Sabrina Thomas and Eryn Roles have consistently recognized that twenty-first century source evaluation must begin reflectively. First, the researcher must take personal inventory on one’s emotions attached to the investigative topic. Often, the open internet is a place to find hyperpartisan information that does not correctly reflect fact. In this session, we will provide a new simple acronym to foster intellectual integrity during inquiry thinking. The IF I APPLY test is a fresh way to introduce students to source evaluation in order to encourage lifelong learning.

Join Kat, Eryn and Sabrina as they discuss their successes & next steps learned from this semester.

profile picture Kat Phillips

Kat Phillips

Kat Phillips is the Nursing & Allied Health Liaison Librarian at Penn State University.She works closely with both the College of Nursing and the Health & Policy Administration department faculty in curriculum development, information literacy standard integration for individual classes and assignments, and embedded librarian services for distance classes.  She is involved with both the Pennsylvania Library Association and the West Virginia Library association, serving on several committees between each, and is also active in other regional and national associations.

 

 

SabrinaPic2

Sabrina Thomas

Sabrina Thomas is an instruction and research librarian for Marshall University. She is currently the library liaison for Art and Design, Communications, and Women’s Studies.  Sabrina teaches in multiple capacities from online eight week courses, embedded, and one-shot classes.  She is passionate about empowering students through teaching source evaluation and promoting digital citizenship. Currently, her research focuses on coordinating efforts on information literacy instruction in public libraries, K-12 schools and community groups in order to combat viral misinformation.

 

 

ERoles7Eryn Roles is a research and instruction librarian at Marshall University in Huntington,WV. Currently she is the library liaison for English and Appalachian Studies and serves as a mentor for students in their first years at MU. She also serves on many association committees including the steering committee for the Appalachian Studies Association and the membership committee for the West Virginia/Western Pennsylvania chapter of ACRL. She, along with Kat Phillips and Sabrina Thomas, co-founded the WV LIRT.

 

 

Remember, C&CS is an online gathering of librarians for us to connect about our projects. We have a interest in hearing from you! Please let us know if you have an idea for a program!

Links to the sessions will be sent out 48 hours before the scheduled time.

 

State of Copyright Union

January 30, 2018

First off, complements to Plagiarism Today which reminded everyone to renew the DMCA registration which expired end of December. (https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2017/12/21/reminder-reregister-dmca-agents-december-31st/?utm_source=newsletter-31&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily+Email+Newsletter).  They also had an annual summary of notable activities which I am taking a liberty to summarize and comment by Jonathan Bailey.

  1. 2017 was a constant stream of plagiarism stories, mostly accusations of plagiarism against prominent figures. They included Neil Gorsuch, David Clarke, Marine Le Pen, Rev. Bill Shillady and the Trump administration. What they all had in common is they were allegations from political opponents attempting to discredit their foes. Some of the allegations had weight, most did not.
  2. PETA attempting (and failing) to convince a court a monkey can hold a copyright. Despite some great litigation taking place, copyright litigation news was, on the whole, cringe-worthy in 2017.
  3. Despite the cries of “alt facts” and “fake news” most mainstream publications, large and small, strive every day to report accurately and fairly. The New York Times (and many other publications) eliminated the public editor position due to financial pressure. Once the representative for the public in the newsroom and the defender of ethics, the position is waning at a time where journalism’s credibility is under attack.
  4. Piracy has never been a static thing and 2017 highlighted streaming services have been slowly taking the spotlight. Shift in piracy means methods for fighting infringement have to change as well.
  5. Essay mills, sites creating school assignments for pay, were in the forefront. The essay mills have also worked hard to make themselves known, turning to Twitter bot armies to peddle their wares and the war between school and essay mill has ramped up. However, studies show the majority of students who pay for a written paper don’t do so through a website, but through a friend or classmate.

So, while 2018 promises to be another wild ride, there are a few things that we can probably expect to happen.

  1. AI has been a tech buzzword, finally starting to see the fruits. Bots already control much of what you see and do online and, soon, they may control much of how you create and how you plagiarize. This came into the spotlight some in 2017 due to a paper published on automated paraphrasing and an article about students using Wolfram Alpha to “cheat” in math class.
  2. Plagiarism hunters to be aggressively looking at nearly every candidate in hopes of finding something to make a story.

3.Ad Blocking has never really left the spotlight. 2017 was the year of the ad blocking DMCA debacle which saw an anti-ad blocking firm file a DMCA takedown notice against an ad blocking list. With visitors feeling further encroached and creators feeling their backs are to a wall, the stage is set for another round in this fight.

4.Legislative Uncertainty: Despite an early push to pass a bill allowing the President to appoint the Register of Copyrights, the bill has since stalled in the Senate. With 2018 being an election year and Congresspersons taking time away to campaign, we’re unlikely to see significant forward momentum on copyright issues. This is despite the fact there are key issues to consider, such as modernization of the copyright office and streamlining music licensing.

5.DMCA The U.S. Copyright Office is slated to take up two separate DMCA-related issues in 2018. The first being a much-anticipated report on the effectiveness of the DMCA safe harbor provisions and the second it’s triennial rulemaking on exemptions to the DMCA provisions against circumventing technological measures to control access to copyrighted works (DRM). Both are likely to spur heated debates about the DMCA. No matter what comes out of these processes they will be controversial and they will be deeply contested so expect a lot of discussion about the DMCA in 2018.

6. Fair Trade – NAFTA, TRANS PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP and others include copyright provisions in their dealings. As long as Congress is as deadlocked as it is, it’s unlikely that anything legislative will come from those conversations.

Call for Panelists: Negotiating with Vendors

January 30, 2018
by

Do you have experience negotiating vendor contracts for your library or district? Do you want to share your experience with other librarians? In a joint sponsored program, the College and Research Division and the Public Library Division are looking for a few savvy negotiators to discuss their experiences working with vendors for their institution.

We are planning a virtual panel session for the end of March that will give some insight to librarians that would like to learn more about the process. We would like to have representatives from a variety of different types of libraries – academic, public, school, or special, as well as a district level negotiator. The panel will include a vendor representative that will give some perspective from the other side of the table. Some questions for discussion:

  • How do you prepare for the negotiation?
  • What do you consider standard practice?
  • What parts of an agreement are vendors most willing to negotiate beyond price (duration, support, payment options, etc.)?
  • How do you close the gap between what you want and what is offered?
  • What pitfalls have you come across in the process?
  • With ever shrinking budgets, do you see vendors being more flexible?
  • Do vendors try to impose non-disclosure agreements?
  • What advice would you give a first time negotiator?

If you are interested in being a panelist, please send a letter of interest to CRDPALA@gmail.com by February 16th, 2018 and attach your CV. If you have any questions please contact, Betsy Reichart at betsy.reichart@pennfoster.edu.

 

Straddling the Fence of Both the Academic World and Public Libraries

January 30, 2018

As a recent graduate with my MLS from Clarion University, I have been eager to jump-start my career as a professional librarian. Initially, I had desired to secure a position within a higher education setting, as my previous employment included a nearly nine-year stint with a bustling, renowned community college. During my time there, I was a textbook specialist and buyer at the college’s campus store. (We used to call them bookstores, but as you know, the radical advances in technology and the rising costs of textbooks have forced vendors to offer cost-saving alternatives, including bundled packages with e-books and online access codes to complete assignments. Hence, campus bookstores have undergone a radical transformation since I first started working full-time at one in 2006.) My last two years at the community college, I worked as a secretary to the Center for International Education, assisting the Director with organizing study abroad trips and working alongside with Admissions to welcome the steady flow of international students registering for classes. It was a very stressful and demanding, yet rewarding, job. During that time, I made the decision to finally pursue my Master in Library Science, something I had been mulling over and putting off for well over a decade. The reason for my hesitation was the delusion that libraries were becoming a thing of the past, immortalized by card catalogs and images of white-haired women with glasses, pressing their fingers to their lips. I was skeptical that I would find employment once I had my Master degree. Additionally, aside from volunteering at a public library when I was in sixth grade for community service hours, I had no experience whatsoever with this magical profession. (To give you an ideal of how long ago that was, imagine a time when Madonna stirred controversy by burning crucifixes in her “Like a Prayer” music video and the Internet had yet to overtake our everyday lives!)

The more I did my research, however, the more I realized that libraries were not going away anytime soon. When others balked at my decision to become a librarian, often accompanied with the (very, very untrue) accusation that no one actually reads physical books anymore, I gently reminded them that a library’s presence within a community is to harness, categorize, and disseminate information. That never changes. However, the format in which information comes to us does change, and will continue to change; therefore, it is the responsibility of us librarians to keep abreast of these changing paradigms. That usually worked and was a satisfactory defense on my part.

Once I started my online classes in Library Science and saw how many of my fellow classmates were introducing themselves with “Hi, my name is… and I work at XYZ Library,” I realized quickly that I was going to need an enormous amount of experience in the library field in order to have a leg to stand on once it came to the job hunt. The best I could come back with is, “Hi, my name is Michele. I work at a community college and I like cats.” I knew I had to change my course. Leaving behind my well-to-do job as a secretary, I secured an internship with the prestigious Lehigh University’s Linderman Library for a summer, and was thrilled beyond words to be a part of such an excellent team. It was there that I assisted in the preservation of older journal series through JSTOR. I volunteered at the Moravian Archives, which specializes in collecting materials associated with the Moravian Church and the early founding of my hometown, Bethlehem. Not wanting to lose my touch with a college setting, I also worked at Lehigh University’s campus store.

Below: The beautiful Linderman Library at Lehigh University is one of two libraries on campus.

2015Lehigh2

I continued building my foundation to become an academic librarian by doing a second internship at the library of my alma mater, DeSales University, during my final semester of graduate school. It was an exciting time to be an intern, as the library was undergoing a migration of databases, moving from Millennium to OCLC WorldCat® Discovery. Despite wanting to eventually start a career as an academic librarian, I dipped my toe into the world of public libraries by taking on a part-time job as a reference and technology services librarian. Since the two libraries were literally right down the street from one another, I was able to do my internship at the university, grab a quick dinner in the campus cafeteria, and then head in for an evening shift at the public library. I loved being a part of both worlds because I am passionate about libraries, whether academic or public.

Now I work as a part-time circulation desk lead at another public library. It is a wonderful, inspiring atmosphere and I enjoy interacting with the various patrons and highlighting main attractions, such as a train display for the month of January. I am hoping that I am still getting enough experience in a public library to help me move forward with becoming an academic librarian. While there are many differences between the two, at the heart of being a librarian, it is all about service. Without the patrons and the students, we would not be needed. Whether helping a patron retrieve tax forms or assisting a college student with an interlibrary loan, it is all about acknowledging that someone needs assistance. It is about being comfortable with technology in all its ever-changing glory and disseminating those changes with the public. Databases and platforms, whether Hoopla, GreenFile, OverDrive, or the Gale Virtual Reference Library, need someone who is at ease navigating them and can reveal to patrons and students just how resourceful libraries can be for any community. Researching the library’s catalog to find that one particular item that will thrill a patron or greatly aid a student with a major project? This is the satisfaction I derive from being a librarian and what makes me passionate about my career.