PaLRaP Call for Submissions
Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice (PaLRaP.org) is accepting submissions for research, practice, feature, and commentary articles as well as news items for the Fall 2024 issue (vol. 12, no. 2).
Research, practice, feature, and commentary manuscripts are welcomed at any time; however, for full consideration for the fall issue, please submit your manuscripts by August 31, 2024.
News item submissions (staff changes, awards/recognitions, events, initiatives, etc. happening in PA libraries that may be of interest to other libraries) are also welcome at any time. However, for full consideration for the spring issue, please submit your news items here by October 1, 2024.
For more information about PaLRaP, including submission guidelines and section policies, visit http://www.palrap.org.
PaLRaP is a peer-reviewed, online, open access publication of the Pennsylvania Library Association’s College & Research Division. This journal provides an opportunity for librarians in Pennsylvania to share their knowledge and experience with practicing librarians across the Commonwealth and beyond. It includes articles from all areas of librarianship, with a special focus on activities at or of interest to Pennsylvania’s academic libraries.
Published biannually: May and November
Co-Editors: Kate Cummings & Roseanne Perkins
Peer reviewers: Members of the Pennsylvania library community
#palrap
Prove It?
Whether you’ve been in this profession for one year or thirty, you are probably familiar with discussions about academic libraries “proving their worth.” Often, these conversations mention assessment in the form of statistics and reports, which are shared with administration, professional organizations, and other partners.
Putting “value” aside for a moment, statistics can be really helpful in showing us where we can make things easier for our communities. Signage needs, collection gaps, staffing level adjustments, and more issues often come through in records of desk interactions. Getting into a habit of recording transactions can illustrate helpful trends or patterns over time.
However, when “value” is brought back into the equation, metrics can be a source of stress. Does a 10-minute interaction carry the same weight as several brief directional questions? Are my statistics (or quantities of records, reports, metadata, etc.) being compared with someone else’s? Do statistics really show the worth of the library, and does that transfer to the worth of those who work there? The list goes on. Some may readily dismiss these concerns; after all, statistics are a way to illustrate the kinds of support libraries provide.
Read more…Contemplative Summer–the future of IL
Earlier this year, folks at Ohio State University Libraries hosted a panel celebrating the 50th anniversary of the term “Information Literacy.” From that one webinar, they created a whole host of opportunities to continue the conversation, particularly about the future of IL. If you did not get a chance to attend any of them, I highly recommend checking them out. They are (or will be) all available on their website.
If you are not sure what to spend your time on, may I suggest:
Exploring the “Teach the Teachers” Model
Description: The “teach the teachers” approach to information literacy focuses on librarians’ providing faculty development programming in order to support instructors’ ability to incorporate information literacy into their courses. In this presentation, hosted by The Ohio State University Libraries, participants will learn more about this model and how it can support librarians’ goals for integrating information literacy into the curriculum. Participants will also learn practical steps for how they can get started developing and implementing faculty development programming.
Information Literacy as a Concept and Practice: Where are We Going?
Description: Definitions of information literacy have evolved over the past 50 years. How does “second wave” information literacy differ from “first wave” information literacy? What changes may be in store for how we think about information literacy as a concept and how we practice information literacy? Should we think about information literacy as a discipline? How will the relationship between information literacy and critical information literacy continue to develop? How should the Framework for Information Literacy evolve? This discussion will explore how our conception of information literacy has evolved and may continue to transform.
There was an obvious need for this series of webinars and panels because I believe they had a couple hundred people in attendance for each one. Hopefully, these presentations will inspire some conversations for you locally! Happy contemplating!
What’s on your summer project list?
In the northeast corner of the United States, the weather pattern has settled into a hot and humid rhythm. For my library, that means it is the summer and time to create a project list!
After our spring semester ended in May, our small staff began a collaborative project list that consisted of three different tiers of things we wanted to work on. To be fair, some of these initiatives were intended to be completed last summer when our staff thought we would have the time and workforce to complete them. Unfortunately, we had an abrupt turnover of multiple staff which left our normal staff of 10 down to 6. We went into survival mode then, and most of these projects got put to back burner.
Now, we are fully staffed and back in project mode. Our first tier of plans consisted of initiatives that we teamed up on and have started executing as of this blog posting. We will have these projects either fully completed or nearly completed by the start of our fall semester. They include drafting a formal remote work policy for our department, updating training documentation and onboarding materials for full-time staff, formalizing student employee work policies, and reviewing and enhancing our Disaster Plan/Emergency Procedure documents.
Depending on the project, a lead was chosen for each initiative, then other staff joined the team if they were interested in collaborating. With only nine FTE, many of us are on multiple project committees, which on the surface can seem overwhelming. However, summers in the library, while lacking the normal foot traffic of the academic school year, are an excellent time to implement new strategies and test them out.
For example, my supervisor and I completed an overhaul of circulation policies (we’re the Access Services Team!) which included extending due dates for students, faculty and staff to semester-long checkouts for certain collections. We streamlined short-term loan items for collections such as DVDs, video games and board games. The flexibility of the summer months allows us to troubleshoot any issues that come up before the fall semester gets into full swing.
Our second tier of projects consists of items we want to start brainstorming and executing, but don’t have a set end date for. These include updating policies for our Relaxation Room, processing gift book donations, and planning for our annual fall finals week event. It’s a big event that requires work to begin months ahead of time. We also began a big purge of items in our basement storage area. One can never underestimate the power of cleaning out all those old office items and little things you thought you might use one day, but 15 years later you still haven’t touched.
Our third-tier items are ideas to brainstorm and figure out the future of but have no real beginning timeframe.
Having this organized and thoughtful list has allowed us to stay on track with our department goals. What are some projects your library has started this summer? I’d love to hear about them!
Improving Learning Outcomes with Real-Time Surveys
The question I receive the most from April to May is what am I doing for the summer because most people I meet assume the library is closed for summer. I don’t know if it’s because people forget students take classes in the summer, but I also respond that I am still working in the summer. I would argue this summer has been busier than my spring semester. It’s the end of June, and I’ve taught three classes, all asking for different information. I still have two orientations before the end of July that will not overlap much information.
This is all to say that I’ve introduced a new evaluation method into my classes this summer. Rather than sending out an evaluation post-class or relying on professor feedback, I’m having students fill out a pre & post-class survey during class time. These surveys have increased student engagement and allowed me to gauge what I should focus on and student familiarity with the materials I present. It also lets me know what I should change and how to change class, depending on materials, content, or activity. I use the feedback to improve upon the next class and the next. I have used Menti and Microsoft Forms to create my surveys and will also try Google Forms soon.
My favorite part of the real-time survey is that I can adjust the length of presentation sections based on what students expect and their comfort levels on various topics. This does not always work as I had hoped, but it’s a process like everything else. While going over the agenda, I also ask students what they expect from me and the class. I do not include the question in the survey. It is something I like to do to give ownership over the class to students. I find this helps their engagement levels.
I have questions specific to what I am covering for each class but follow a similar flow. Rather than send out a survey link, I ask students to scan a QR code to complete the survey and have them fill out the first two questions before we begin and the last two at the end of class. I give students one to two minutes to fill out the form. The first question is what you would like to focus on most today, and I have students rank agenda topics. I ask this question to adjust my talking points. I do not want to spend 30 minutes going over using databases if it turns out students would instead take more time on citations. From here, I ask how comfortable they are coming into class on our agenda topics. Students have five options, from very uncomfortable to very comfortable. I am again able to gauge my time in an area and how engaged I should make a section. For example, I most recently taught on Citations and included a Zotero setup. I walked students through setting up accounts, finding an article, and joining a group.
After we have gone over all the materials to cover, I will take about 5 minutes at the end of class to answer any follow-up questions and have students take the second half of the survey. Again, I ask them to rate their comfort level with our agenda topics post class from very uncomfortable to very comfortable, with a range of 5 options. This lets me know how students feel after class and what (if any) additional information I should include on slides I send out after, and it enables the professor to know what students got out of the class. The final question is open-ended and receives the least number of responses, but it lets me know how to improve upon covered topics directly. I ask if there is anything they would like to see or do differently from me in the class.
When I send the slides to professors after class, I include a summary of the survey results. I do this so that they know and will (hopefully) continue to use library resources and share their experience with colleagues. Sharing the results also lets professors know how valuable a resource the library is and continues to be. As I continue to improve upon the survey, I would love to know more about the types of measures and questions others ask. If you have any suggestions or recommendations, feel free to reach out or comment below!
